From the ancient practices of etching symbols of both cultural and intimate significance onto human skin to modern-time artistic expression through ink, tattoo artistry has undergone a number of shifts over the centuries, drawing from a treasure trove of techniques and traditions.
In a more contemporary context, discussions and debates have, as of late, been sparked around a seemingly harmless element – the use of numbing agents. These debates have left room for a deeper exploration into the very essence of tattooing.
As modern-day tattoo artists aspire to strike a balance between innovation and tradition, a clash of perspectives has divided this realm, with individuals passionately arguing for or against the usage of anesthesia during their ink-saturated sessions.
A magnetic figure that has been fearlessly advocating for traditional tattooing methods is Steve Butcher, a New Zealand native who has recently moved his practice to the south of the Golden State. With an educational background rooted in traditional art and an inclination for artistry far beyond the surface, Steve has become synonymous with unparalleled craftsmanship.
Steve’s reputation as a master tattoo artist is supported not only by his creative genius but also by his unapologetic adherence to traditional tattooing practices.
Unlike some contemporary artists who frequently use numbing agents to ease their clients’ discomfort, Steve holds a firm stance against them. His opposition is rooted in the belief that numbing agents detract from the authenticity of the tattoo experience because, for him, getting a tattoo is not just about the end result but also about the journey.
“I see it as a sort of rite of passage that involves confronting and overcoming pain,” Steve shares.
While he acknowledges that this perspective may deter some potential clients, Steve remains convinced that anesthetics do not benefit either the artist or the client by dulling the sensory experience.
Still, this viewpoint is not universally shared within the industry. Some professionals, such as those working with clients with lower pain tolerance, see value in numbing products. Their argument is that these agents can minimize pain and discomfort, making the tattooing process more bearable for the clients.
On the other hand, Steve shares some further, unique concerns. “Local anesthetics can sometimes alter skin textures, which affects the final outcome of the tattoo.”
Moreover, Steve feels that using numbing creams or sprays can interfere with the connection established between the artist and the client. From his perspective, these agents create a physical barrier that dilutes the shared experience of the creative process, stating that, while uncomfortable, the sensation of pain can deepen the bond between the two parties.
In essence, the use of anesthesia threatens to transform the process into a transactional interaction rather than a collaborative effort. “It changes the client’s role from an active participant to a sort of a passive recipient,” Steve argues.
Regardless of the varying opinions within the industry, Steve’s position remains unchanged. His commitment to the craft and to his personal values is evident in his work, making his tattoos not only visually stunning but also emotionally significant.
As the debate over numbing agents continues to divide the industry, Steve Butcher reminds us that tattoos are more than just permanent marks on the skin. They are stories etched in ink, symbols of personal journeys and experiences.
By embracing the discomfort associated with the process, Steve invites his clients to fully engage in these journeys, nurturing a shared connection that moves beyond the physical act of tattooing.
As the man himself puts it, “Every prick of the needle, every moment of discomfort, is a step towards something beautiful. It’s not just ink on skin. It’s life etched in art.”
